Weather | Traffic | Surf | Maps | Webcam


   
 
Forums Visitors Guide Shopping Classifieds Autos Homes Jobs Entertainment Sports Today's Paper Home

 News
 Metro | Latest News
 North County
 Temecula/Riverside
 Tijuana/Border
 California
 Nation
 Mexico
 World
 Obituaries
 Today's Paper
 AP Headlines
 Business
 Technology
 Biotech
 Markets
 In Depth
 Iraq / Afghanistan
 Pension Crisis
 Special Reports
 Video
 Multimedia
 Photo Galleries
 Topics
 Education
 Features
 Health | Fitness
 Military
 Politics
 Science
 Solutions
 Opinion
 Columnists
 Steve Breen
 Forums
 Weblogs
 Communities
 U-T South County
 U-T East County
 Solutions
 Calendar
 Just Fix It
 Services
 Weather
 Traffic
 Surf Report
 Archives
 E-mail Newsletters
 Wireless | RSS
 Noticias en Enlace
 Internet Access

 Sponsored Links

L.A. prosecutors oppose Spector trial motions


ASSOCIATED PRESS

8:39 p.m. July 24, 2008

LOS ANGELES – Jurors in Phil Spector's upcoming murder retrial should be allowed to hear testimony about blood evidence and the autopsy of the actress he is accused of shooting, prosecutors argued in court documents filed this week.

In the filings, the Los Angeles County district attorney's office opposed an earlier motion by Spector's lawyers to exclude testimony presented at the record mogul's first trial by three forensics experts. Those include Dr. Louis Pena, who testified that he conducted an autopsy and concluded the death of 40-year-old Lana Clarkson was a homicide.

Spector, famed for his “Wall of Sound” recording technique in the 1960s, is accused of shooting Clarkson at his Alhambra mansion on Feb. 3, 2003.

The defense claims Clarkson shot herself, either accidentally or on purpose.

The first trial ended with a jury deadlock last year. Spector faces a September retrial on a charge of second-degree murder.

Spector's attorneys have filed several motions to exclude evidence. They also filed a motion arguing that jurors in the retrial shouldn't be allowed to convict Spector on lesser offenses.

At the first trial, the judge refused to instruct the jury that they could find Spector guilty of voluntary or involuntary manslaughter. His attorneys argue that the judge's decision amounted to acquitting Spector on those charges and that the Constitutional ban on double jeopardy means he cannot face them again.

However, that claim “flies in the face of logic and law,” the district attorney's office argued in a Tuesday reply.

“The court never impliedly or otherwise factually acquitted (the) defendant of voluntary or involuntary manslaughter,” the filing argued.

Dennis Riordan, a San Francisco attorney representing Spector, said he planned to file replies Friday opposing the prosecution arguments.

“We're preparing substantive responses,” he said.

Meanwhile, a Los Angeles judge on Thursday set a May 4 trial in Spector's breach-of-contract lawsuit against the attorney who first represented him.

Spector claims Robert Shapiro did inadequate work on the first murder case and wants him to return a $1 million retainer.

Shapiro has denied Spector's claims.


 Sponsored Links







Quicklinks
Restaurants Bars
Hotels Autos
Shopping Health
Eldercare Singles
Business Listings
Free Newsletters


Guides
Vegas Spas/Salon
Travel Weddings
Wine Old Town
Baja Catering
Casino Home Imp.
Golf SD North
Gaslamp


© Copyright 1995-2008 Union-Tribune Publishing Co. • A Copley Newspaper Site